Chain plane
Solana carries rendezvous hints, epoch timing, sampler publications, and heavier covert commitments. Fast epochs keep liveness moving. Slow epochs anchor the more expensive covert state.
Protocol
Covenant uses Solana for rendezvous and timing, QUIC for live peer-to-peer transport, relayers when the direct path fails, and threshold-sharded storage when the recipient is offline.
Solana carries rendezvous hints, epoch timing, sampler publications, and heavier covert commitments. Fast epochs keep liveness moving. Slow epochs anchor the more expensive covert state.
Peers hole-punch and run live messaging over direct QUIC whenever the network path allows it. Live messages prefer direct transport rather than chain or storage.
Offline payloads are Shamir-split into k-of-n shards and placed on independent storage nodes so no single server can reconstruct the ciphertext by itself.
Fallback Logic
Direct sessions are the preferred live path. They keep messages off chain and away from storage nodes.
Symmetric NATs and similar failure modes can still converge through a relayer without changing the higher-level envelope model.
Delayed delivery is not “store the plaintext somewhere.” Ciphertext is sealed, split, and distributed below the reconstruction threshold.
Questions
Because Covenant needs a shared timing and rendezvous substrate. Solana is the coordination plane, not the normal live message path.
No. Live traffic prefers direct QUIC. Chain activity is for rendezvous, timing, publications, and heavier commitment-facing state.
That is where relayers come in. The relayed path exists for the network cases where direct hole punching does not converge.
Only a shard, not the whole ciphertext. Threshold splitting means a single server does not have enough material to reconstruct the payload.